Spendor A7 loudspeaker


Audio Research LS5 preamplifier & BL2 input controller


Germany’s Scholz sees recovery fund as more than money


Cambridge Audio Edge A integrated amplifier


CH Precision M1.1 power amplifier


PS Audio UltraLink D/A processor


Wisconsinites Flood Open Bars After 'Safer At Home' Struck Down


Coronavirus : "chute vertigineuse" des remboursements en optique et dentaire


Father, Son Charged In Shooting Death Of Black Georgia Jogger


Judge Blocks Pritzker From Enforcing Coronavirus Executive Order

Ted Baker ‘disappointed’ with High Court ruling against Axa Insurance

  • MEDIATORECONDOMINIALE
  • November 4, 2019
  • News
  • No Comments

British high street retailer Ted Baker has been temporarily hindered
in its long-running, multi-million pound legal dispute against its
former insurers, Axa Insurance, when the High Court decided not to
uphold a claim for the loss of profit after a series of thefts from
its inventory.

The fashion retailer said that it was “disappointed with this outcome”
and that it was “considering its options” in a statement. Ted Baker
added that this judgment “will have no significant impact on the
financial position of the group and no impact on its trading.”

Ted Baker set back in legal dispute

The legal dispute dates back to December 2008, when three employees
working at a Ted Baker warehouse in London were arrested, charged and
then later convicted of the theft of stock from the retailer’s
inventory between 2004 and 2008. As a result of the series of thefts,
Ted Baker suffered a seven figure loss.

Click Here: Maori All Blacks Store

At the time, the high street retailer was insured by Axa Insurance,
along with two other co-insurers Tokio Marine and Fusion, through a
commercial combined insurance policy. Ted Baker went forward to win an
insurance claim for 1 million pounds for the loss of stock, as well as
3 million pounds for the resulting loss of profits and business
interruption.

But Axa Insurance, fought the claim, maintaining that the terms of
their policy did not cover claims for employee theft, and that at the
time neither the retailer nor its insurers had intended for its
insurance policy to extend to include employee theft. Axa Insurance,
along with the co-insurers, also claimed that non-disclosure and
misrepresentation from Ted Baker’s intermediaries nullified any cover
claims.

Then, in 2012 the High Court over ruled a previous court judgment and
stated that the terms of the theft extension clause were ‘full’, which
indicated that the fashion retailer was covered for its direct losses
and Ted Baker was awarded the claim for the loss of stock.

However, the high street retailer has now been setback in relation to
its larger claim loss for the consequential loss of profits following
the thefts. Since starting its legal process against Axa Insurance,
Ted Baker added that it had “provided 2.6 million pounds for its own
legal costs incurred up to 9 August, 2014 and those results did not
include any contingent asset for the claim.”

“In line with the group’s accounting treatment, any additional costs
that may arise from this judgment will be treated as an exceptional
item.” For the 28 weeks that ended August 9, 2014, Ted Baker reported
a 15.1 percent rise in UK and European retail sales as well as a 13.8
percent growth for its US and Canada retail sales. Asia retail sales
were up 16 percent and e-commerce sales grew 48.9 percent.


Got Something To Say!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BACK TO TOP