Stop Exploiting LGBT Issues to Demonize Islam and Justify Anti-Muslim Policies

Catastrophism Is as Much an Obstacle to Addressing Climate Change as Denial

Brexit Anyone? Why the US Should Care About Thursday’s Vote in the UK

UN Calls for 48-Hour Ceasefire So Aid Can Reach War-Ravaged Aleppo

Climate Activists Occupy Greenpeace UK Headquarters—Wait, That Can't Be Right

Olivia Wilde, Rihanna, Reese Witherspoon, and More Send Prayers to Hurricane Matthew Victims

Lykke Li Directed a NSFW Music Video for Her New Supergroup, LIV—Watch

Kylie Jenner Talks Body Image and Reveals Her Weight: “I Like the Chunkiness”

Jennifer Lopez Shares Sweet Story Time with Her Twins at 35,000 Feet

Gigi Hadid Is Ready for Kendall Jenner’s 21st Birthday “Weekend”

Reporter ordered to reveal sources or pay $200-a-day fine

  • October 29, 2019
  • News
  • No Comments

NMU MINNESOTA Confidentiality/Privilege Nov 14, 2001

Reporter ordered to reveal sources or pay $200-a-day fine

A newspaper story published nearly five years ago that quoted unnamed sources who criticized a fired high school football coach has prompted a contempt fine against a newspaper reporter.

A reporter for a weekly newspaper in Minnesota must decide by Nov. 23 whether to appeal a judge’s order to reveal confidential sources or pay a $200-a-day fine.

The fine could exceed $36,000 since the underlying defamation case will not go to trial for six months, said Mark R. Anfinson, attorney for reporter Wally Wakefield.

“It’s definitely going to have the potential for deterring other governmental sources from talking to reporters under a promise of confidentiality,” Anfinson said.

Wakefield, a reporter for the Maplewood Review in suburban St. Paul, wrote an article published in January 1997 after Richard Weinberger was fired as football coach at Tartan High School. The school fired Weinberger because of accusations of misconduct and maltreatment of his players, according to court records.

Wakefield’s article contained several statements from unnamed school officials who said Weinberger intimidated Tartan football players. Weinberger sued the school district and several school officials for defamation, and he subpoenaed Wakefield to learn the identities of the confidential sources.

Minnesota has a shield law that generally protects reporters from revealing confidential sources. However, the law includes an exception for defamation cases in which a court can order disclosure.

Ramsey County District Judge Dale B. Lindman ordered Wakefield on Aug. 8 to identify the sources of 10 statements in the story. The judge ruled that Weinberger’s need for the information outweighed the reporter’s need to keep sources confidential. Weinberger had no alternative means for unmasking the sources, and disclosure would be the only way Weinberger could match each statement to a defendant, Lindman ruled.

On Nov. 6, the judge found Wakefield in contempt of that order and told Wakefield to either comply with the order or appeal by Nov. 23. If Wakefield fails to do either, the $200-a-day fine will begin Nov. 24.

Wakefield isn’t considering complying, Anfinson said.

(Weinberger v. Independent School District No. 622; Media counsel: Mark R. Anfinson, Minneapolis)MD

© 2001 The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press

Return to: RCFP Home; News Page

Click Here: All Blacks Rugby Jersey

Got Something To Say!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *